• Cart
Log in

Log in

Performance Audit Resources

Our resources help public sector performance auditors build capacity and strengthen accountability. These resources include CCAF-FCVI Audit News, Training, Research & Methodology and Events & Presentations.
Read More...

CCAF Home Oversight

PAC/Oversight Resources

CCAF’s oversight program supports oversight committee members and their support staff. We provide research, material and professional development workshops to oversight committees both in Canada and abroad.

Our support enables parliamentarians to become familiar with their role and improve the effectiveness of their committees. This includes information on understanding performance audit, and how these audits can help improve public administration.
Read More...

  1. Performance Audit Resources
  2. PAC/Oversight Resources

Advancing Public Sector Audit, Oversight & Governance

Since the 1990s, governments in Canada have experimented with new, innovative procurement approaches, including different types of Public-Private Partnerships (P3). Under the P3 model, project phases (decision, contracting, design, construction and operation) are usually integrated in single, long-term contract (sometimes over 30 years) and a number of project risks (e.g. financing, construction delays and cost over-runs, infrastructure performance) are assumed by the selected private sector partner in exchange for a risk premium. The private partner can be offered incentives to meet or exceed performance targets and penalties can be applied when performance does not meet expectations. Though private partners play a larger role in project execution than under the traditional approach, the public sector still retains control and ownership of the infrastructure. The number of P3 agreements has been steadily increasing in Canada in recent years.

Audits of Public-Private Partnerships projects tend to focus on:

  • The adequacy of decision-making processes and of information for decision-making (in relation to the decision to use the P3 approach).
  • The rigour of Value-for-Money assessments and the reasonableness of the assumptions made in comparing the P3 option with the traditional procurement option.
  • The justification and documentation of significant decisions.
  • The adequacy of the information supporting risk transfer decisions and the reasonableness of risk premiums paid to private partners.
  • The monitoring of compliance with contractual clauses during the operational phase of projects.
  • The achievement of expected project objectives and outcomes (interim or final).
  • The fairness and transparency of procurement processes (including tendering).

Click here for examples of objectives, criteria, findings, recommendations and more